FRI Home Page 
About FRI 
Research
FRI In the News
return to:
Communications
Other Resources
Department of Food Microbiology & Toxicology
UW-Madison 
 

Fall 1999, Vol. 11, No. 3                   October 1999
Perspective
Research
Short Subjects
  • Presentations, Visitors, Workshops, Etc.
World Literature
 
Perspective
return to top

Alternatives to Antibiotics

Mark E. Cook, FRI and Dept. Animal Sciences
In the 1950s, researchers showed that animals raised in germ-free environments grew more rapidly than those raised in the presence of normal bacterial flora. At the time of these early studies, it was unclear why an animal's exposure to bacteria suppressed growth and decreased feed efficiency. However, it was clearly shown in these early studies that animals given antibiotics showed improved growth when exposed to environmental microbes, but not when raised in germ-free environments. Hence the use of antibiotics as growth promotants and as a method to improve feed efficiency became commonplace in modern animal agriculture. Antibiotic use has had its controversy, and while many hypotheses were developed to explain the growth promotant, none seemed to withstand scientific testing.

In the 1980s, research began to show that growth depression due to exposure to environmental microbes was not caused by the microbes themselves, but instead was due to the animal's immune response. Immune cells, upon encountering a foreign stimulant, release peptide signals (cytokines) which profoundly alter physiological processes. Cytokines released during an immune response stimulate skeletal muscle catabolism, increase select protein synthesis in the liver, induce anorexia (decreased food intake) and cause fever. As a result, the immune-stimulated animal eats less and grows more slowly. Feeding antibiotics reduces the concentration of immune stimulants and thus lowers cytokine production, hence antibiotics improve growth by reducing immune stimulation.

Concern has increased that feeding low levels of antibiotics is generating antibiotic resistance. We have sought alternative approaches to improve growth in immune stimulated environments. Attempts to remove immune stimulation (in this case, bacteria) results in microbial resistance. Suppression of the immune system is not a wise approach (even though we know it will enhance growth) because of the resulting susceptibility to invading pathogens. We were left with only one avenue to enhance growth: alter the animals' physiological response to cytokines. In previous newsletters, we have written of several technologies (conjugated linoleic acid and mass antibody production). We believe strategies that alter the animal's response to its immune system will result in improved methods to stimulate growth and improve feed efficiency without the use of antibiotics.


Research
return to top
 
Immunoassays of Selected Mycotoxins in Hay, Silage and Mixed Feed: An Entrée to Significance of Mycotoxin Level on Animal Health and Performance
return to top
 
 
 
 
While foods and feeds contaminated with certain mycotoxins are potentially hazardous to human and animal health, the presence of sub-lethal levels of mycotoxins often results in a decrease in immune response, loss of body weight and decrease in productivity of farm animals. One of the problems frequently encountered by the use of moldy feed is a decrease in milk production, and sometimes body weight loss. It is not known which mycotoxins, or group of mycotoxins, is responsible for the decrease in productivity. There is need for a systematic survey on the relationship of the health status of the animals to feed quality, fungi population and mycotoxin content in the feeds. Analysis of feeds is difficult because feeds constitute a very complex matrix. In the present study, several immunoassays, including radioimmunoassay (RIA) and direct competitive enzyme linked-immunosorbent assays (dc-ELISAs), for the analysis of the mycotoxins Alternaria alternata (AAL), cyclopiazonic acid (CPA), deoxynivalenol (DON), fumonisin B1 (FmB1), PR toxin (PRT) and zearalenone (ZEA) in hay, silage and mixed feed were established. The toxins were extracted from the feed with 84% acetonitrile in water, then the filtrates were diluted with buffer and directly subjected to dc-ELISA for AAL toxin, CPA, FmB1, PR and ZEA. For total DON including DON, 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-AcDON), and 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-AcDON), the extracts were air-dried, acetylated, and subjected to both RIA and dc-ELISA. The average percent recoveries of toxins added to hay at 0.3 and 1.0 ppm were 77.5, 111, 95.8, 85.7, 95.5 and 138 for AAL-toxin, DON, CPA, FmB1, PRT and ZEA, respectively. When the sample extracts were subjected to a C-18 reversed-phase cartridge treatment prior to dc-ELISA, the recovery of ZEA at 0.1 and 1.0 ppm levels was found to be 111 and 75%, respectively. Analysis of 63 samples (25 hay and 38 others, including corn silage and mixed feed) showed frequencies of AAL toxin, DON, CPA, FmB1, PRT and ZEA were 96.8, 100, 87.3, 36.5, 76.2 and 3.2%, respectively. The overall average concentrations of toxins in the feed were 0.56, 0.73, 0.34, 0.28, 0.13 and 0.22 ug/g (ppm) for AAL toxin, DON, CPA, FmB1, PRT and ZEA, respectively. For hay alone, the frequencies were 100 (average level of 0.72 ppm), 100 (average level of 0.61 ppm), 80 (0.39 ppm), 52 (0.12 ppm) and 80% (0.15 ppm) for AAL, DON, CPA, FmB1 and PRT, respectively. Zearalenone was not found in the hay samples. Data from the present limited survey showed that: (i) while low levels of mycotoxins were present, only a few samples were contaminated with high levels of DON and FmB1, primarily in the corn-related products; (ii) the presence of AAL toxin, CPA and PR toxins indicates clearly that toxic fungi of the genera Alternaria, Aspergillus and Penicillium were present in the hay and corn silage in addition to the several species of Fusarium; (iii) although our limited data cannot lead to any conclusion on whether the performance of animals was affected by these low levels, the established methods are adequate for a systematic study to learn if low levels of mycotoxins are related to the decreased milk production, or are affecting any other performance in farm animals.
—W. Yu, F. Y. Yu, D. Undersander, and F. S. Chu
 

Monitoring of Microcystin–Protein Phosphatase Adduct Formation with Immunochemical Methods
return to top
Algal blooms have become a growing public health problem worldwide in recent years because some of the secondary metabolites produced by them are toxic to mammals. In freshwater lakes or waterways toxic blue green algae (cyanobacteria) blooms frequently occur. These algae produce products called microcystins and nodularins which are cancer promoters and cause liver damage, gastroenteritis, diarrhea, and dermatitis in animals and humans. In addition to water, MCYSTs were also found in health food algal products, which may have a potential health hazard to users. Mechanistically, MCYST-LR, one of the major variants in this group of toxins, is a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatase (PPase) 1 (PP1) and 2A (PP2A). The inhibitor effect is due to its interaction with the enzyme through covalent binding and free form. We have developed a series of specific antibodies against MCYSTs, as well as a sensitive immunoassay for the toxin. In the present study, an immunoblotting method was developed to monitor the adduct formations both in vitro and in vivo. The detection limits for the covalent binding of MCYST-LR with the recombinant protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and rabbit liver cytosol proteins were found to be 0.1 ng and 0.3 ng per assay, respectively. MCYST-PP1 adducts were detected 30 seconds after the addition of MCYST-LR into the reaction mixture. Immunoblotting analyses and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay showed that between 5 min to 16 hr after i.p. injection of a single dose (35 ug/kg) of MCYST-LR into mice, up to 27% of the injected toxin was found covalently bound while 0.2–9.2% existed free form in liver cytosol. Our data suggest that the newly developed method could be used for monitoring MCYST intoxication in humans and animals.
—Biing-Hui Liu, Feng-Yih Yu, X. Huang, and Fun Sun Chu
 
Life in Acid: What Can We Learn from Bacteria That Thrive in Extreme Environments?
return to top
The National Science Foundation recently announced awards to further our knowledge of "Life in Extreme Environments" (LexEn). It is thought that this new information will help understand the beginnings of life on this planet and others, and develop new technologies and processes. An interdisciplinary group of researchers at the University of Wisconsin–Madison was selected to study Life in Acid. The group is led by Dr. Jillian Banfield from the Department of Geology and Geophysics, and includes Brian Fox, Department of Biochemistry, Institute for Enzyme Research, and Charles Kaspar, Department of Food Microbiology and Toxicology, Food Research Institute. The 3-year project will identify and monitor the microbes present in dissolving pyrite-rich deposits (FeS2, natural sulfide mineral) which contain metal-rich, sulfuric acid solutions with pH values of 0–2. Why is this of interest to food microbiologists? FRI Director Emeritus Mike Foster stated it best when he said, "Food microbiology is nothing more than an extension of environmental microbiology." The recognition of the acid-tolerance properties of Escherichia coli O157:H7 following outbreaks involving acidic foods such as apple cider, dry-fermented salami, mayonnaise, and yogurt has driven research to find the physiological and structural components that contribute to this tolerance to low pH. Moreover, it is hypothesized that tolerance to gastric acidity permits low-infectious dose pathogens, like E. coli O157:H7 and others, to bypass this gastric barrier. Thus, understanding the growth and/or survival in acid by microbes in extreme environments may shed insight on acid tolerance in foodborne pathogens. Dr. Banfield's laboratory will employ standard culture methods and DNA sequencing to identify iron-oxidizing bacteria associated with drainage from Iron Mountain mine near Redding, California. The drainage from this site is highly acidic (pH <1.0) and contains Fe>21,000 mg/L, Zn >2,000 mg/L, Cd >16 mg/L, Cu >200 mg/L, and As >47 mg/L. Previous analyses of this site have isolated Leptospirillum, Ferromonas, and Acidomicrobium spp. that will be metabolically characterized. Chuck Kaspar of FRI will investigate the influences of membrane lipid composition on survival in acidic solutions with high ionic strength. Proteins involved in iron oxidation, enzymes and cytochromes among these divergent organisms will be characterized in detail by Brian Fox's laboratory to determine if there is a common or unique respiratory chain present. In addition to understanding the mechanism of acid tolerance, the research may identify enzymes, molecules, or organisms of commercial significance.
 —Charles W. Kaspar

Detection of Food Allergens
return to top
Allergens in foods pose a major problem for the food-allergic individual. Labeling of food products for the presence of food allergens is at present the most effective way for the food-allergic person to prevent reactions. Food processors are concerned about the possibility of cross-contamination of products by food allergens. This is especially true when a manufacturer runs a product containing a known food allergen through its equipment, and following a clean-up operation, runs another product which does not contain any allergens. How are the processors and consumer to know if the nonallergic product has become contaminated? To answer this question a number of laboratory tests have been conducted, and the development of assays which can be used by the processor to detect food allergens is coming into commercial use. Since peanuts, eggs, and milk are among the most important sources of food allergens in the United States, most efforts have been directed at detecting these allergens. In the research laboratory, the RAST (radio-allergosorbant) inhibition assays have been widely used. This immunoassay employs serum from food-allergic individuals and utilizes a radioactive-labeled antibody to IgE for the detection of the allergen. While useful in the research laboratory, the limitations imposed by the use of human serum and radioactivity prevent its commercial use by the food industry. Other approaches that have recently become commercially available employ an ELISA (enzyme-limited immunoassay) technique that utilizes polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbits. Assays are available for peanut (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, United Kingdom; Neogen Corporation, Lansing, MI; and ELISA Technologies, Alachua, FL) and egg (Neogen). Detection limits for the assays range from 0.1 ppm for peanut (Pro-Lab) to 1–2 ppm (Neogen) and 0.5 ppm for egg (Neogen). These assays generally can be performed in 45 minutes and avoid the use of radioactive materials. Other assays are available for peanut and egg (Neogen), but the sensitivity levels are higher (2.5–25 ppm). Our laboratory has utilized a PCR (polymerase chain reaction)–monoclonal antibody-based assay that has an extremely low level of detection. However, this is only a research tool at present. While the use of immunoassays potentially can reduce the risk of reactions for the food-allergic consumer, many questions still remain. Are the assays sensitive enough or are they too sensitive? Are the assays applicable to a wide variety of food matrices that can affect the results? What are the legal implications of testing? Many technical, legal, and ethical questions need to be addressed.
Robert K. Bush

Natural Antimicrobial Components Isolated from Yerba Maté (Ilex paraguariensis)
return to top
Ilex paraguariensis St. Hilaire var. paraguariensis is a South American native perennial tree belonging to the holly family (Aquifoliaceae). South American inhabitants have used it as a refreshing stimulant tonic drink (prepared by infusion of its dried leaves and twigs) long before Jesuits recorded the habit in the sixteenth century. Although in many South American countries it is drunk more frequently than any other beverage, maté, erva-maté or yerba maté as it is called as only recently become known in Europe has an alternative to Indian or Chinese tea. The leaves are also used in popular medicine, and included in medicinal herbal products as a tonic, stimulant to the central nervous system, diuretic and antirheumatic. It contains a significant amount of secondary metabolites such as caffeine, triterpenes, caffeoylquinic acid derivatives (chlorogenic acid), purine alkaloids and methylxanthines. The crude extract of yerba maté exhibited antimicrobial activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium, and Pseudomonas fluorescens. The antimicrobial compounds were identified as dicaffeoylquinic acid derivatives, monocaffeoylquinic acid derivatives, methylcaffeate and caffeic acid. Three isomers of monocaffeoylquinic acids were isolated and identified as 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid, 4–O-caffeoylquinic and 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid. Likewise, three isomers of dicaffeoylquinic acids were revealed as 3,4-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid and 4,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid. This is the first report of caffeic acid and methylcaffeate in yerba maté. All of the antimicrobial compounds were extracted from dried leaves with 25% methanol and isolated by flash column chromatography, preparative TLC and reversed phase HPLC. The antimicrobial properties of monocaffeoylquinic acids, dicaffeoylquinic acids and methylcaffeate were conducted in microtiterplates by microdilution assay. All of them showed inhibitory effects against all bacteria tested but methylcaffeate was the most effective antimicrobial component in the inhibition of food-related bacteria. These compounds were most inhibitory at pH 8.0 and still retained the inhibitory activity after heat treatment at 121C for 15 min.
Tipparat Hongpattarakere and Eric A. Johnson
 

Short Subjects
return to top
 
Visitors
Chu
Wong
Cook
Johnson
Foster
Workshop
 
Chu Travels in China: 
Dr. Fun S. Chu was invited by the Institute of Nutrition, Food Hygiene and Food Safety of Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine (CAPM) to Beijing, China, in June to give a keynote speech on recent progress of mycotoxin research. He also gave a series of lectures on the application of immunochemical assays for mycotoxins in a workshop entitled "National Workshop on Immunochemical Methods for the Detection of Mycotoxins in Foods and Feed." Participants in this workshop were mostly from the CAPM and from Provincial Anti-Epidemic and Preventive Stations, and Food Inspection Stations. Discussion were held on various mycotoxin problems and preventive measures for minimizing the problem in China.
Wong Presentations and posters by Professor Amy C. Lee Wong: 
"Tri(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether and 12-crown-4-ether plasma coating of stainless steel to prevent bacterial attachment and biofilm deposition." Agnes R. Denes, Eileen B. Somers, Amy C. L. Wong, and Ferencz Denes [Poster]. Center for Plasma-Aided Manufacturing Annual Meeting/Workshop, July 7-8, 1999, UW–Madison campus. "Tripartite hemolysin BL: experimental and predictive analysis of structure and function." Douglas J. Beecher and Amy C. Lee Wong [Talk]. "Requirement of flhA for flagella assembly, swarming differentiation, phospholipases and hemolysin BL secretion in Bacillus thuringiensis." E. Ghelardi, D. J. Beecher, F. Celandroni, M. Pastore, A. C. L. Wong, D. Lereclus and S. Senesi. This is a collaborative research effort between the University of Pisa, Italy, and our lab [Talk]. "Heterogeneity observed in hemolysin BL, a tripartite enterotoxin produced by Bacillus cereus." Jean L. Schoeni and Amy C. Lee Wong [Poster]. 2nd International Workshop on the Molecular Biology of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus thuringiensis in Taos, New Mexico, August 11-13, 1999. 
Visitor: 
Dr. Emilia Ghelardi from the University of Pisa, Italy, visited Wong's lab for three weeks (July 19–August 9) to continue our collaboration to determine whether the swarming phenotype of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis is related to the expression of virulence factors. Emilia also visited us for six weeks last fall. 
Summer Research Program: 
Participated in the UW–Madison Summer Research Program for Undergraduates in Biology, and had a student, Lai Thao, in a research project on resistance of biofilm bacteria. Lai is also a Ronald E. McNair Scholar.
Cook Talks by Mark Cook: 
May 25–27, 1999. "Conjugated linoleic acid." Multi-state Poultry Feeding and Nutrition Conference and Degussa Technical Symposium. Indianapolis, IN.  
May 28–June 2, 1999. "Conjugated linoleic acid and health." International Conference on Diet and Prevention of Cancer. Tampere, Finland.  
June 22, 1999. "Conjugated linoleic acid." The Reciprocal Meat Conference. Stillwater, OK.
Johnson New Personnel: 
Stephanie Whittum has joined Johnson's laboratory to study Clostridium botulinum for her M.S. and Ph.D. This past summer, she performed an internship at the Pillsbury Company. Prior to that she attended Ohio State University and majored in microbiology. Kendra Thornton spent the summer in Johnson's laboratory in the National Science Foundation sponsored program Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) in the Department of Bacteriology. 
Graduated Personnel: 
Carlos Echavarri Erasun received his M.S. in Bacteriology in July 1999. The subject of his thesis was the "Regulation of Astaxanthin Biosynthesis in the Yeast Phaffia rhodozyma. 
Papers and Symposia presented by Professor Johnson:  
An invited seminar entitled "Improving microbial detection towards ‘Real Time' in the Symposium "Research Goals of the National Food Safety Initiative" at the Ninty-ninth General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Chicago, IL. An invited paper at the Annual Meeting of the Institute of Food Technologists in Chicago in July entitled "Consequences of stress and resistance responses during food processing." 
Chaired a session on "Microbial toxins as therapeutic agents" and presented two papers at the Society for Industrial Microbiology meeting in Arlington, Virginia, in August 1999. The titles of his papers were "Botulinum toxin as a therapeutic agent" and "Regulation of astaxanthin biosynthesis in the yeast Phaffia rhodozyma." 
Awards: 
Johnson has received a three-year research grant from the National Institutes of Health entitled "Regulation of Botulism Toxin." A two-year grant from the USDA entitled "Novel Antimicrobial Systems for Inactivation of Microbial Pathogens." Two grants from University–Industry Relations (UIR): "Development of Terpenoids from Wisconsin Agricultural Products to Sensitize Microorganisms to Antimicrobials" and "Determination of Neuron Targeting Sequences of Botulinal Neurotoxin using Synthetic Mimetic Compounds."
Foster Invited presentation by E.M. Foster:  
"Food microbiology research: The road ahead" in a colloquium "Pasteur to the Present: a Food Microbiology Retrospective and Prospects for the Future" at the Ninty-ninth General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Chicago, IL. 
Workshop  The Center for Dairy Research and FRI jointly sponsored and managed a dairy food safety workshop on September 1, 1999. About 35 people attended, primarily plant personnel. 
 
Visitors
return to top
 
Bel/Kaukauna, USA and Fromageries/Bel S.A.
Research, development and engineering staff from Bel/Kaukauna, USA and Fromageries/Bel S.A., France, were here to discuss ongoing projects of mutual interest, particularly regarding cheese safety.  
Back row, L to R: K. Anjan Reddy, Technical Director Bel/Kaukauna USA (Wisconsin); Francine Schloegel-Moudry, Technical Director Bel/Kaukauna USA (Kentucky); Jacque Daurelles, Director of Development Process Cheese, Fromageries/Bel; Mark Johnson, Senior Scientist Dairy Research, Food Science Department, UW–Madison; Eric Johnson and Ron Weiss, FRI; Marie-Helene Chassagne, Chief of Research Application Group, Fromageries/Bel. 
Front row: Jean-Paul Gaulier, Engineering and Equipment Development, Fromageries/Bel; Robert Gilbert, President Bel/Kaukauna USA; Kathleen Glass and Mike Pariza, FRI.


 
Pillsbury
Senior Research and Technology staff members from Pillsbury, a Diageo Company, were here to confer on current and pending research projects at FRI. 
Back row, L to R: Mike Pariza, FRI; Joe Shebuski, Senior Microbiologist, Pillsbury; Ron Weiss, FRI; Hans F. Zoerb, Director Strategic Technology Development, Pillsbury; David Domingues, Senior Research Scientist, Strategic Technology Development, Pillsbury North America. 
Front row: Ann Larson, Kathleen Glass and Eric Johnson, all from FRI.

World Literature
return to top
 
Dioxin in the Food Chain – Again  return to top
What happened ...
Dioxin is a chemical contaminant which seems to appear periodically in foods or the environment, attract a lot of coverage in the press, and often involve political repercussions. The latest incident originated in January of this year in a fat rendering plant in Belgium where about 8 L of used PCBs led to contamination of 1600 tons of feed (enough to feed 10 million chickens for a day).

Farmers noticed that hens were sick and their eggs were failing to hatch. During the investigation in April, chickens and feed were found to contain high levels of dioxin and related compounds (200–500 times background levels). Amounts of these polychlorinated compounds were similar to the amounts found in contaminated rice oil in the Yusho incident in Japan in 1968. Since the contaminating fluid was a mixture of several compounds, concentrations of contaminants were reported as TEQ or toxic equivalency (sum of the concentrations of the compounds times their relative toxicity). Contaminant levels reported for chickens and eggs intended for hatching ranged over 958, 741, 713, 266 TEQ parts per trillion (pg/g fat). Feed contained 781 parts per billion (ng TEQ/g).

It was not until the end of May that these results were publicized by the Belgian government, and chicken and egg products were withdrawn from the market. Milk and pork may have been contaminated as well. The furor resulting over the government's slow response forced the resignation of the Belgian Prime Minister after his party lost in the national elections.

How important was it ...
The political and economic consequences to the government, the farmers, feed industry and some food manufacturers and exporters have been significant, if not downright disastrous. Health effects on the population will be more difficult to assess. It has been estimated that background human daily consumption of dioxin compounds in the U.S. ranges from 0.3 to 8 TEQ pg/kg body weight with meat and dairy products accounting for 99% of that exposure. Contaminant levels in Belgian chicken (average of 850 TEQ pg/g) were very high as compared to dioxin levels reported in 1994 in U.S. poultry (0.03 pg/g) and beef (0.04-1.5 pg/g). During 1997 dioxin-contaminated chickens containing 25 TEQ pg/g or more were found in supermarkets in the U.S., and the source was also traced to chicken feed. In this case, dioxin was present in a clay added as an anti-caking agent to the feed. Although the Belgian chickens were more highly contaminated, only a limited amount of contaminated feed was produced while the American chickens may have been consuming contaminated feed for several years. No acute effects on human health have been reported in the U.S. and none has been reported so far in Belgium.

Since we all consume minute amounts of these chlorinated compounds in our food daily, apparently without ill effects, how much is too much? Numerous cohorts of persons exposed to high levels of PCBs and dioxins in the past have been followed to determine health effects. These groups include: (1) persons exposed to dioxin after an explosion at a chemical plant in Seveso, Italy, in 1976; (2) persons consuming contaminated rice oil in Japan (1968) and Taiwan (1978-1979); (3) U.S. servicemen who spread defoliants in Vietnam as part of Operation Ranch Hand; and (4) groups of industrial workers who were occupationally exposed to these compounds. In addition, there have been epidemiological studies of consumers of Great Lakes fish, Dutch children, and, most recently, persons living in rural, cotton-growing areas of Kazakhstan.

What do all these studies tell us? One undisputed consequence of acute exposure to high levels of PCBs, dioxins and related compounds is skin lesions called chloracne, and also alterations in liver function. These chlorinated compounds accumulate in body fat and are released slowly with estimates of half-life residence in the body ranging from 7 to 15 years.

Do dioxins cause cancer or affect cardiac, neurological, hormonal, or immune function? In animals, the answer is yes. The available epidemiological data for humans is always incomplete; the answers are not so clear cut and are subject to dispute. Nevertheless, IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) concluded in 1997 that dioxin is a human carcinogen. Data from Seveso suggest that the incidence of leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and cardiovascular disease is higher in the most highly exposed persons. Other data reported in 1999 on a group of 5132 chemical workers in the U.S. who were exposed to dioxin indicated an increase in mortality for all cancers combined, with excess cancer deaths occurring primarily in highly exposed workers. Children who were in utero during the Yusho and Yucheng rice oil contamination have been found to have an excess of neurologic and respiratory disorders as well as other abnormalities at birth. Some effects on cognitive development have also been noted in children of persons consuming large amounts of Great Lakes fish.

Data on other exposed populations indicate that we should not expect immediate adverse health effects from the contaminated chicken and eggs in Belgium, but dioxins and related compounds are not innocuous, and the increased body burden of these compounds may make the population more susceptible to illness in the future.

—Ellin Doyle

return to:
FRI Newsletter, Fall 1999 index  |  FRI Communications  |  FRI home page   |   Dept. Food Microbiology & Toxicology  |  UW–Madison  |



Copyright © 1999 Food Research Institute
Last modified: 1 October 1999

Questions or Comments? e-mail Barbara Cochrane