English 711 : Research Methods in Applied Linguistics

Syllabus for Fall 2007

Tuesdays and Thursdays, 9:30 to 10:45 a.m., 2251 Humanities

bulletInstructor
bulletAssessment and Grading
bulletRequired Texts
bulletCourse Outline
bulletAims of the Course
bulletFocal Studies
bulletAssignments
bulletInstructor's Home Page

Professor Richard F Young 7163 Helen C White Hall
Office hours: Thursdays, 4:00 - 6:00 p.m., or by appointment

E-mail: rfyoung at wisc dot edu
Home Page: www.wisc.edu/english/rfyoung
Phone: 263-2679

Class E-mail List. You may send e-mail messages to me and to all students registered for this course through the class e-mail list.  Send your messages to english711-1-f07 at lists dot wisc dot edu.  In order for you to receive messages from the e-mail list, your e-mail address must be in the Registrar's database.  You can update your preferred email address by accessing My UW-Madison, "Student Records" tab, "Preferred Address" module.

Back to topBack to top

Required Texts

bullet Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
bullet Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher's guide to statistics and research design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
bullet Ryan, B., Joiner, B., & Cryer, J. (2005). MINITAB® handbook. (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole—Thomas Learning.
bullet Focal studies that are the subject of learning activities are available in PDF format here.

Recommended Materials

bullet American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of The American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
bullet MINITAB release 15. Statistical software for Windows® 2000, XP or Vista. You can download a rental version of MINITAB release 15 from e-academy at www.e-academy.com/minitab. MINITAB is also available for you to use on all the Windows computers in the infolabs at the Memorial Library room 140 and at Union South lower level.

Back to topBack to top

Aims of the Course

This course is designed to prepare graduate students in second language acquisition and other branches of applied linguistics to critically evaluate published research in their field and to design their own research studies.

The course will introduce the main concepts of research in applied linguistics and especially in second language acquisition. The course aims to make you comfortable with critically evaluating published reports of both quantitative and qualitative research studies in our field. The methodology of quantitative research, especially the use of inferential statistics, will be the main focus of the second half of the course. If you intend to use statistics in your own research, however, I advise you to take an in-depth and hands-on treatment of statistics in education. Consider taking the series of two courses offered in the Department of Educational Psychology: 760 and 761, Statistical Methods Applied to Education I and II.

Back to topBack to top

Assignments

Learning Activities. Most weeks there will be one or two Learning Activities, the aim of which is for you to get hands-on experience with critiquing published studies or with solving problems in the design of research. These activities must be done in pairs. Each member of the pair will receive the same grade. Each week, one pair of students will present their own responses and facilitate seminar discussion of the previous week's learning activities. Hard copies of assignments are due on the day specified in the Course Outline Assignments that are handed in or emailed late will receive a failing grade. If you miss class on a day when an assignment is due, you may send your responses as an email attachment to the class grader, Heather Carroll, with a copy to me. During the first half of the course you will write critiques of published studies of research in applied linguistics. Guidelines for critiquing quantitative and qualitative studies are available here.

SLA Exam Questions. There will be two examination questions taken from past papers of the Preliminary Exam for the Ph.D. program in SLA. You should answer these questions individually. One question will focus on a qualitative study and one on a quantitative study. An essay formatted in APA style is required to answer each of the exam questions.

Authorship. Some assignments in this course involve integrating information from published sources into your own writing. This means that you need to be careful not to plagiarize: "to steal or pass off (the ideas and words of another) as one's own" or to "present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source" (Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th edition, p. 888). For advice on what sources you should document and how to document them, consult Quoting and Paraphrasing Sources on the Writing Center website, from which the preceding statement is taken.

Back to topBack to top

Assessment and Grading

Grade name
Percent cutoff
Letter grade equivalent
Narrative
A+
100
100%
Excellent. Work goes well beyond the requirements of the assignment.
A
93
96%
Demonstrates full understanding of all concepts; creatively applies theories and methods to new problems in the field.
AB
85
88%
Intermediate grade.
B
77
80%
Demonstrates understanding of all concepts; can correctly apply theories and methods to new problems in the field.
BC
69
72%
Intermediate grade.
C
61
64%
Demonstrates understanding of some but not all concepts; some errors in applying theory and methods to new problems in the field.
D
53
56%
Demonstrates understanding of a limited number of concepts; many errors in applying theory and methods to new problems in the field.
F
0
0%
Lack of understanding of concepts; not capable of applying theories and methods to new problems in the field.

Format. All written work must use APA style.

Grades. Letter grades will be awarded for the written responses to the learning activities (40% of the final grade), seminar facilitation (10%), and exam essays (25% of the final grade for each). The meanings of the grades are as follows.

Incompletes. The grade of "Incomplete" will only be used for a student who has carried the course with a passing grade until near the end of the semester and then, because of illness or other unusual and substantial cause beyond his/her control, is unable to complete the research project.

Back to topBack to top

Course Outline

Dates Topics Main Readings Learning Activity Facilitators
Tuesday, September 4 Introduction to research in applied linguistics

Mackey & Gass, Chapter 1

Brown, Chapter 1

   
Thursday, September 6 Ethical issues in research involving human subjects

Mackey & Gass, Chapter 2

Complete UW-Madison’s on-line Human Subjects Tutorial, due Tuesday, September 11.  
Tuesday & Thursday, September 11 & 13 Types of applied linguistics data Mackey & Gass, Chapter 3 Critique Gass (1994) and Pica et al. (1993), due Tuesday, September 18.

Kaitlin and Jason

Ethical issues in research involving human subjects

Tuesday & Thursday, September 18 & 20 Variables in applied linguistics research

Mackey & Gass, Chapter 4

Brown, Chapters 2, 3, & 4

Critique Derwing et al. (1998) and answer question 12 in Mackey & Gass pp. 134-135, due Tuesday, September 25.

Melissa and Gabriel

Types of applied linguistics data

Tuesday & Thursday, September 25 & 27 Designing a quantitative study

Mackey & Gass, Chapter 5

Brown, Chapters 6 & 7

Critique Skehan & Foster (1999) and answer question 5 in Mackey & Gass, p. 161, due Tuesday, October 2.

Sandra and Nate

Variables in applied linguistics research

Tuesday & Thursday, October 2 & 4 Designing a qualitative study Mackey & Gass, Chapter 6 Critique Garrett & Young (2006, June 17), due Tuesday, October 9.

Karen and Carolina

Designing a quantitative study

Tuesday & Thursday, October 9 & 11

Classroom research Mackey & Gass, Chapter 7 Answer question 5 in Mackey & Gass, p. 220, due Tuesday, October 16.

Kelly and JK

Designing a Qualitative study

Tuesday & Thursday, October 16 & 18 Critiquing published studies Brown, Chapter 5

SLA Exam Question: Read Jenkins & Parra (2003). In this report of qualitative research, identify 3 to 4 of the most important points in the research questions, methodology, argument, and analysis and discuss their strengths and/or weaknesses.

Essays are due on Tuesday, October 23.

Alice and Anne

Classroom research

Tuesday & Thursday, October 23 & 25 Statistical logic and coding

Brown, Chapters 8 & 9

Mackey & Gass, Chapter 8

Critique Young (1996), due Tuesday, October 30.  
Tuesday & Thursday, October 30 & November 1 Introduction to MINITAB MINITAB handbook, Chapters 1, 2, & 3

Do exercise 1-7 in the MINITAB handbook, p. 39; exercise 2-10 in the MINITAB handbook, pp. 64-65; and exercises 3-1 to 3-4 in the MINITAB handbook, p. 95. Assignments are due on Tuesday, November 6.

Isil, Brajesh, and Chiharu

Coding

Tuesday & Thursday, November 6 & 8 Descriptive statistics and graphs MINITAB handbook, Chapters 4 & 5

Do exercise 4-11 in the MINITAB handbook, p. 138 (Download the dataset from the companion website) and exercise 5-5 in the MINITAB handbook, p. 174. Assignments are due on Tuesday, November 13.

Sandra and Nate

Introduction to MINITAB

Tuesday & Thursday, November 13 & 15 Analyzing quantitative data

Mackey & Gass, Chapter 9

Answer questions 2, 3, and 5 in Mackey & Gass, pp. 292-295, due on Tuesday, November 20.

Isil, Brajesh, and Chiharu

Descriptive statistics and graphs

Tuesday, November 20 Correlation

Brown, Chapter 10

MINITAB handbook, Chapter 11

Do exercise 11-9 in the MINITAB handbook, p. 352, due on Thursday, November 29.

Kaitlin and Jason

Analyzing quantitative data

Tuesday, November 27

“Making Sausage, i.e., Doing Research.”

Guest lecture by H. Gary Cook, Embedded Research Scientist, Value Added Research Center, Wisconsin Center for Education Research

Thursday & Tuesday, November 29 & December 4 Comparing means

Brown, Chapter 11

MINITAB handbook, Chapter 9

Do exercises 9-2, 9-6, and 9-10 in the MINITAB handbook, pp. 279-282, due on Thursday, December 6.

Carolina and Karen

Correlation

Thursday & Tuesday, December 6 & 11

Comparing frequencies

Brown, Chapter 12

MINITAB handbook, Chapter 12

Answer question 5 in Mackey & Gass, pp. 294-295 and then perform the same calculations in MINITAB. Assignments are due on Thursday, December 13.

Gabriel and Melissa

Comparing means

Thursday, December 13    

Final Exam: Read Dewaele (2007). In this report of quantitative research, identify 3 to 4 of the most important points in the research questions, methodology, argument, and analysis and discuss their strengths and/or weaknesses.

Your essays should be emailed to me by Tuesday, December 18.

Alice and Anne

Comparing frequencies

Back to topBack to top

Focal Studies

Derwing, T., Munro, M., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393-410.

Dewaele, J-M. (2007). Predicting language learners’ grades in the L1, L2, L3 and L4: The effect of some psychological and sociocognitive variables. International Journal of Multilingualism, 4(3), 169-197.

Jenkins, S., & Parra, I. (2003). Multiple layers of meaning in an oral proficiency test: The complementary roles of nonverbal, paralinguistic, and verbal behaviors in assessment decisions. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 90-107.

Garrett, P., & Young, R. F. (2006, June 17). Theorizing affect in foreign language learning: An analysis of one learner’s responses to a communicative-based Portuguese course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Montréal, Québec.

Gass, S. (1994). The reliability of second-language grammaticality judgments. In E. Tarone & S. Gass & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 302-322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120.

Young, R. (1996). Form-function relations in articles in English interlanguage. In R. Bayley & D. R. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 135-175). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Back to topBack to top

This page last revised November 13, 2007 .