Tuesdays and Thursdays, 2:30 - 3:45 p.m., 1651 Humanities
![]()
![]()
![]() |
Professor Richard F Young 7163 Helen C White Hall Office hours: Thursdays, 4:00 - 6:00 p.m., or by appointment E-mail: rfyoung at wisc dot edu Home Page: www.wisc.edu/english/rfyoung Phone: 263-2679 |
Class E-mail List. You may send e-mail messages to me and to all students registered for this course through the class e-mail list. Send your messages to english333-1-f07 at lists dot wisc dot edu. In order for you to receive messages from the e-mail list, your e-mail address must be in the Registrar's database. You can update your preferred email address by accessing My UW-Madison, "Student Records" tab, "Preferred Address" module.
![]()
| Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. (2nd edition). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. "The textbook" is available in the College Library Reserve Book Collection, 1st Fl. West, Room 1191. Call Number: P118.2 G37 2001. | |
| Gass, S., Sorace, A., & Selinker, L. (1999). Second language learning: Data analysis. (2nd edition). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. "The workbook" is available in the College Library Reserve Book Collection, 1st Fl. West, Room 1191. Call Number: P118.2 G374 1999. I will make available audio recordings for use with the workbook. | |
| Course packet available from Bob's Copy Shop. |
![]()
This course is a general introduction to scientific research into how people learn a second language. Although the course is designed to be accessible to students from a wide variety of backgrounds, some knowledge of the linguistic structure of English will be assumed.
Second language acquisition, or SLA, is a theoretical and experimental field of study which, like first language acquisition studies, looks at the phenomenon of language development -- in this case the acquisition of a second language. The term "second" includes "foreign" and "third", "fourth" (etc.). Since the early nineteen seventies, SLA researchers have been attempting to describe and explain the behavior and developing systems of children and adults learning a new language.
The dominant aim behind this research is to extend our understanding of the complex processes and mechanisms that drive language acquisition.
By virtue of the fact that language itself is complex, SLA has become a broadly-based field and it now involves:
| Studying the complex pragmatic interactions between learners, and between learners and native speakers | |
| Examining how non-native language ability develops, stabilizes, and undergoes attrition (forgetting, loss) | |
| Carrying out a highly technical analysis and interpretation of all aspects of learner language with the help of current linguistic theory | |
| Developing theories that are specific to the field of SLA that aim to account for the many facets of non-native behavior | |
| Testing hypotheses to explain second language behavior |
The goal of SLA is to understand how learners learn and it is not the same as research into language teaching. However, applied linguists whose particular interest is in facilitating the language learning process should find ways of interpreting relevant SLA research in ways that will benefit the language teacher. SLA, in this light, should become an essential point of reference for those involved in educational activities and researchers looking at how to facilitate the learning process.
![]()
Attendance and Readings. All students are expected to attend class regularly and to complete weekly readings assigned from the textbook and from the course packet.
Exams. Your knowledge and interpretation of the readings and lectures will be assessed by two take-home examinations. The mid-term exam will be handed out on Tuesday, October 17 and is due on Thursday, October 19. The midterm will focus on chapters 1 - 7 of the textbook. The final exam will be handed out on Thursday, December 14 and is due before Wednesday, December 10 at 12:05 p.m. Exams that are handed in or emailed late will receive a failing grade. The final will focus on chapters 8 - 14 of the textbook. Questions on both exams will be taken from the "Points for Discussion" sections at the end of each chapter in the textbook. After you receive your grade for the midterm, you have one week in which you may choose to rewrite your answer to one question that you have attempted. I will read your new answer and re-grade your midterm accordingly. No rewrites are possible for the final exam.
Presentations of SLA Research. In groups of 3-4 students, you will be responsible for making one or more presentations of SLA research from articles that I assign from the course packet.
In preparing your presentation, you should ...
| Read the chapter or articles. | |
| Prepare an oral presentation that summarizes and critiques for the rest of us the theory described in the reading, and (if empirical studies of SLA are reported), describe and critique the methods used in the studies and their results. Your oral presentation should last no longer than 20 minutes. | |
| Write up your presentation as a paper and hand it to me for comments and grading. | |
| Your seminar paper should be between 2 and 4 pages long (not including title page and bibliography). |
SLA Problem Sets. All students are expected to attempt assigned problem sets involving the analysis and interpretation of second language data from the workbook and textbook. Some problem sets involve analysis of audio data, which is available for download here. The problem set relating to topics covered in Thursday's and Tuesday's lectures is due on the following Thursday. Each activity must be done in groups of between 3 and 5 students. Each member of the group will receive the same grade. Hard copies of your responses are due on the day specified in the Course Outline. If you miss class on a day when an assignment is due, you may send your responses as an email attachment to the class grader, Betsy Tremmel, with a copy to me. Late assignments will not be accepted.
Authorship. Many of your assignments for this course involve integrating information from published sources into your own writing. This means that you need to be careful not to plagiarize: "to steal or pass off (the ideas and words of another) as one's own" or to "present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source" (Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th edition, p. 888). For advice on what sources you should document and how to document them, consult Quoting and Paraphrasing Sources published by the Writing Center, from which the preceding statement is taken.
![]()
Letter grades will be awarded for the SLA problem sets and for the presentations of SLA research. Percent scores will be awarded for the exams. The meanings and equivalencies of the grades follow.
Grade name |
Percent cutoff |
Letter grade equivalent |
Narrative |
A+ |
100 |
100% |
Excellent. Work goes well beyond the requirements of the assignment. |
A |
93 |
96% |
Demonstrates full understanding of all concepts; creatively applies theories and methods to new problems in the field. |
AB |
85 |
88% |
Intermediate grade. |
B |
77 |
80% |
Demonstrates understanding of all concepts; can correctly apply theories and methods to new problems in the field. |
BC |
69 |
72% |
Intermediate grade. |
C |
61 |
64% |
Demonstrates understanding of some but not all concepts; some errors in applying theory and methods to new problems in the field. |
D |
53 |
56% |
Demonstrates understanding of a limited number of concepts; many errors in applying theory and methods to new problems in the field. |
F |
0 |
0% |
Lack of understanding of concepts; not capable of applying theories and methods to new problems in the field. |
The final grade for the course will take into account grades awarded on all assignments in the following proportions.
Midterm Exam |
25% |
Final Exam |
25% |
Presentations of SLA Research |
20% |
SLA Problem Sets |
30% |
Incompletes. The grade of "Incomplete" will only be used for a student who has carried the course with a passing grade until near the end of the semester and then, because of illness or other unusual and substantial cause beyond his/her control, is unable to take the final exam.
![]()
| Dates |
Topic | Textbook | SLA Research Presentations | Assignments Due | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tuesday, September 4 |
Introduction | Chapter 1 | |||
Thursday & Tuesday, September 6 & 11 |
Looking at interlanguage data | Chapter 2 | |||
Thursday & Tuesday, September 13 & 18 |
The role of the native language: An historical overview | Chapter 3 | Carolina Bernales, Anya Safenka, Frances Housley, & Alice Astarita present Corder (1967), Dusková (1984), and Lado (1957). |
Workbook problem 1.1: Acceptability judgments | |
Thursday & Tuesday, September 20 & 25 |
Child language acquisition: First and second | Chapter 4 | Susan Sesolak, Juanjuan Xiao, Pi-Yu Kao, and Craig Allan present Hyltenstam & Abrahamsson (2003). |
Chapter 3, problem 10
Please complete this error analysis assignment for compositions 2 & 3 only. Remember that error analysis includes the following steps: (a) identification and classification of errors, (b) distinguishing between errors and mistakes, (c) quantifying the errors, and (d) evaluating the seriousness of the errors. After completing your error analysis, describe the difficulties you encountered in doing it. For example, are there ambiguities? How could you resolve them? Finally, try to determine the NLs of these two writers. What features determine your choice? |
|
Thursday & Tuesday, September 27 & October 2 |
Revised perspectives on the role of previously known languages | Chapter 5 Handouts on: |
Jennifer Daniels, Fatemah Misharifi, and Anne Strauss present Kellermann (1986) and Schachter (1974). |
Chapter 4, problem 4. These data are analyzed from the perspective of Universal Grammar in Usha Lakshmanan's (1991) article "The boy for the cookie:" Some evidence for the non-violation of the Case Filter in child second language acquisition. If you are interested in Lakshmanan's analysis of this child's interlanguage, read the article here in PDF format. | |
Thursday & Tuesday, October 4 & 9 |
SLA and linguistics | Chapter 6 | Jessica Hersh, Samantha Lepage, Rebecca Rutkowski, and Samuel Sahakian present Bardovi-Harlig (1999) and Eckman, Moravcsik & Wirth, (1989). |
Workbook problem 2.1: Polysemous words
Follow the directions in the workbook. In re-ordering the sentences in Question 1, please reproduce the sentences in the new order in your MS Word document. (Reproducing the English translations of the Dutch is fine.) |
|
Thursday & Tuesday, October 11 & 16 |
Universal Grammar | Chapter 7 | Barbara Brzeski, Tiffany Iliadis, Paula Mason, and Kristen Scharff present Kanno (1997) and White (1990). |
Workbook problem 4.2: Final consonants
The data in this exercise are phonetic transcriptions. You can listen to the actual pronunciation of final consonants in two more examples of ESL speech from NSs of Spanish and Mandarin Chinese in Apple QuickTime format. Midterm exam handed out on Tuesday, October 17 |
|
Thursday & Tuesday, October 18 & 23 |
Looking at interlanguage processes: (1) Knowledge representations |
Chapter 8 | Caroline Anderson, Rachel Bowline, Angela Close, Yuriko Ide, and Naoko Shiroma present Bialystok & Sharwood Smith (1985) and MacWhinney (1997). |
Midterm exam due in class on Thursday, October 19 | |
Thursday & Tuesday, October 25 & 30 |
Interlanguage pragmatics |
Chapter 9 | Sara James, Polina Pogosyan, Kaitlyn Rikkers, and Brajesh Samarth present Bialystok (1990) and Young (1993). |
Chapter 8, problem 8 | |
Thursday & Tuesday, November 1 & 6 |
Input, interaction, and output |
Chapter 10 | Workbook problem 6.7: Compliments Complete Parts 1 and 3 as directed. For Part 2, please answer questions 5-7 for the following data items: 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 11. |
||
Thursday & Tuesday, November 8 & 13 |
Chapter 11 | Workbook problem 6.4: Cooperative discourse
Please complete all workbook questions. In order to understand both the process of transcription and to become familiar with the data, please complete the transcription of Part 1. You may wish to divide the transcription responsibilities and complete your individual section before meeting with your group to complete questions 2 and 3. The transcription for Part 2 is supplied here in PDF format in order for you to complete questions 4-7. |
|||
Thursday & Tuesday, November 15 & 20 |
Individual differences in SLA: (1) Aptitude (2) Motivation |
Chapter 12 | Sandra Terra, Anne Dargent, Chiharu Shima, Isil Erduyan, and Barbara Bird present Dörnyei & Skehan (2003). |
Chapter 11, problem 4 | |
Tuesday & Thursday, November 27 & 29 |
The L2 lexicon | Chapter 13 | Debby Egly, Yung-tzu Lin, Kenji Endo, Chris Hooker, and Charles Cikulin present Poulisse & Bongaerts (1994) on Thursday, November 29. |
Please think back to a language learning event that caused you emotion, describe it in narrative form, and complete a stimulus appraisal of the event using the format provided HERE. Next, read the excerpts from the language learner memoirs of Eva Hoffman and Richard Watson. Identify three events in each of their memoirs that caused Hoffman and Watson emotion. Complete stimulus appraisals for each event. Due Tuesday, November 27. | |
Tuesday & Thursday, December 4 & 6 |
Overview of SLA |
Chapter 14 | |||
Tuesday & Thursday, December 11 & 13 |
Final exam handed out on Thursday, December 13 | ||||
Friday, December 21 |
Final exam due by 9:25 p.m. on Friday, December 21. Late exams will receive a failing grade. | ||||
![]()
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), 341-382.
Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies: A psychological analysis of second-language use. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Chapter 2.
Bialystok, E., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Interlanguage is not a state of mind: An evaluation of the construct for second-language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 101-117.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(4), 161-172.
Cumming, A. H. (1994). Alternatives in TESOL research: Descriptive, interpretive, and ideological orientations. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 673-703.
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-630). Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dusková, L. (1984). Similarity-An aid or hindrance in foreign language learning? Folia Linguistica, 18(1-2), 103-115.
Eckman, F., Moravcsik, E., & Wirth, J. (1989). Implicational universals and interrogative structures in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Language Learning, 39(2), 173-205.
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539-588). Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Kanno, K. (1997). The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English speakers. Second Language Research, 13(3), 265-287.
Kellerman, E. (1986). An eye for an eye: Crosslinguistic constraints on the development of the L2 lexicon. In E. Kellerman & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition (pp. 35-48). New York: Pergamon.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Excerpts reprinted in S. M. Gass & L. Selinker (eds.), Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, (pp. 21-32).
Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches to second language research. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1-32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557-581.
MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acqusition and the competition model. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 113-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T. (1994). First language use in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 36-57.
Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24(2), 205-214.
White, L. (1990). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 121-133.
Young, R. (1993). Functional constraints on variation in interlanguage morphology. Applied Linguistics, 14, 76-97.
![]()
This page was last updated on November 20, 2007 .