|
Lessons
learned at the interdisciplinary interface: A
profile of Paul H. Williams
Academic institutions are busily
recon-figuring their biology departments and
establishing novel programs that bring together
researchers from multiple disciplines. Some of
the most productive research areas in the life
sciences, in fact, are at the interface between
traditional disciplines. Thus, it should be no
surprise that some of the most exciting advances
in life sciences education are at the interface
between scientists and science educators.
In classrooms and laboratories throughout the
United States, undergraduate biology education is
undergoing great change. Many people have already
contributed substantially to these changes, and
many others are exploring ways to build on that
work. One such person is Dr. Paul H. Williams, a
plant pathologist who, over the course of his
professional career, has been actively exploring
the interface between science and science
education.
Dr. Paul H.
Williams was the first recipient of the
Excellence in Teaching Award presented by
the American Society of Plant
Physiologists. Dr. Williams is known
nationally for the Wisconsin Fast
Plants program and Bottle
Biology, in which he brings his
research interests in brassica plants to
instructional materials for teachers and
students of all ages. Dr. Williams is an
emeritus professor of Plant Pathology at
the University of Wisconsin-Madison. A
past president of the American
Phytopathological Society, he is a
current member of the Education Committee
of the American Society of Plant
Physiologists. Dr. Williams is a founding
member of the CELS Steering Committee. |
Paul Williams has spent his
entire professional career at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison, first as a graduate student
and then as a faculty member in the Department of
Plant Pathology. Williams feels Aenormously
privileged" for that long affiliation and
grateful for the support of his faculty
colleagues and university administration.
Although he became an emeritus professor in 1997,
he continues to develop rapid-cycling brassica
plants as models for research and for his
"Wisconsin Fast Plants" program, which
uses the plants for biology exploration at all
levels of education.
Like many academic researchers, Williams has
periodically replotted the course of his
activities. Each decade of his career, he noted,
has been marked by productive activity in a given
research area, followed by an opportunity to
reflect and take a longer view of the field, and
capped by a deliberate shift in focus. His
research interests, while always connected to a
cabbage breeding program and host-pathogen
interactions, shifted from biochemistry and
physiology to genetics and, more recently, to the
relationships between genotype and environment as
they influence phenotype.
Benefits of a teaching
community
During his academic career, Williams benefited
from a teaching environment that was
characterized by continual mentoring and
collegiality. "I was fortunate to be
involved in the Biology Core Curriculum at the
University of Wisconsin-Madison for 25
years," remarked Williams. An integrated
biology program for students who select a
rigorous series of foundational science and
mathematical courses, the Biology Core Curriculum
draws faculty from across the biological
disciplines to teach on a voluntary basis. These
faculty imparted a sense of community
characterized by shared values: strong,
individual commitments to student learning; a
desire to experiment in their teaching; and an
openness to sharing their own philosophies about
pedagogy and curriculum.
"Dr. Marion Meyer, a zoology professor
who participated in the Biology Core Curriculum
for many years, shepherded my growth from an
unimaginative teacher focusing on the compendium
of existing knowledge toward sharing the
excitement of learning with my students,"
said Williams. "After several years and
several mixed successes, I became comfortable in
sharing my excitement C dare I say passion C for
doing science." Indeed, students leaving
Williams' laboratories often remarked that they
finally grasped why scientists found creative joy
in their work.
In retrospect, Paul Williams credits this
special teaching community for giving him the
self-confidence to take risks with the
curriculum. "I have learned that the
vitality that comes from community and the
validation of teaching as a scholarly and
professional enterprise are powerful allies in
sustaining my convictions," he said. He
encourages others to either find or forge such a
community at their own institutions and through
their professional organizations.
Science educators as
professional collaborators
Fortunate to have supportive colleagues who
were committed to excellence in teaching,
Williams introduced his research organisms C
rapidly cycling stocks of brassica plants C as
models for research and education that
exemplified a hands-on, investigative approach.
Buoyed by feedback from his students and by
colleagues on other campuses who experimented
with these "Wisconsin Fast Plants,"
Williams began to develop instructional materials
for students of all ages. At that point,
serendipity arrived in the form of Robert
Haffner, a student assistant who helped care for
Williams' brassica plants and was also a master's
student with Dr. Jim Stewart, a professor of
Curriculum and Instruction in the School of
Education at Wisconsin. Dr. Stewart taught
science education courses for prospective
precollege teachers and was eager to collaborate
in the "Wisconsin Fast Plants" program
to bring pedagogically sound, innovative
materials to precollege classrooms. Indeed, this
collaboration was probably essential for securing
funds from the National Science Foundation.
Not unlike the climate at many academic
institutions at that time, relations between the
science faculty and the School of Education at
Wisconsin were decidedly chilly. Nonetheless, Jim
Stewart became a "boundary crosser,"
stepping into the culture of a scientist so that
the complementary experience and rigor of the
scientist and the science educator could
synergize for the benefit of students. In
hindsight, Paul Williams describes his
willingness to invite a "boundary
crosser" and, in turn, to become a
"boundary crosser" as crucial to
positioning himself at the richly productive
interface that is characteristic of
interdisciplinary activity.
The American Society of Plant Physiologists,
and particularly the chair of its education
committee, Dr. Ellen Weaver, validated Williams'
early forays into using brassica plants as
instructional materials by inviting him to
present at its annual meetings and those of the
National Science Teachers Association. From
poster sessions to exhibits and sponsored
workshops, the encouragement from professional
societies led to an unexpected insight: namely,
the recognition that teachers are eager for more
of the stories that scientists normally share
among themselves. Thus, Williams and other
researchers took to storytelling, with careful
attention to the use of appropriate language, to
become acquainted with the boundaries and
interfaces between scientists and science
educators. By being receptive to teachers and
their criticisms, Williams began to see how the
highly specialized scientific language had been
used to set science apart. "By partnering,
teachers and researchers could craft a language
to help integrate science more completely into
the everyday life experiences of teachers and
students," said Williams. "Through the
appropriate use of language, the wonders of the
natural world, as understood through science, can
C along with other creative forms of human
expression, such as art, music, and poetry C
contribute to an understanding of human
life."
An unbroken thread in Paul Williams' academic
career C and, indeed, in the careers of many
faculty C is his important role as an academic
scientist attending to a spectrum that
encompasses the generation of new knowledge, the
integration of new and existing knowledge that
leads to novel insights, and the communication of
those insights toward public understanding.
Faculty interact with public constituencies
through various avenues of human endeavor: some
through the medical professions and their
patients, others by contributing knowledge to
plant and animal breeders and thence to the
farming constituency, yet others by influencing
policy makers and consumers. Through progressive
transitions in his career, Williams has
positioned himself at the stimulating and
satisfying interface between his specialized
discipline of plant pathology and a constituency
of teachers eager to learn more about the
insights he has to offer. "In fact, the many
teachers that I have come to know over the past
10 years have been an enormous source of
inspiration and stimulation to me," said
Williams. "I encourage research faculty to
get to know some science teachers as practicing
professionals. Much can grow at the interface
from such acquaintances."
Individuals as change agents
Seven years ago, the Coalition for Education
in the Life Sciences (CELS) was created as part
of a nationwide effort to address science
education reform. Individuals representing
various professional societies came together to
improve biology education, as described on pp.
14-15 of this monograph. Upon joining CELS, Paul
Williams helped to develop a coherent framework
for what students should know about the life
sciences. Through the language of the
"Issues-Based Framework for Bio 101,"
CELS organizers wanted to portray biology as a
creative endeavor, integrated into life
experiences, with relevancy and understanding
that are crucial to bringing harmony to future
generations.
"One of life's lessons is that each of us
has a remarkable capacity to make a
difference," said Williams. "We can
point to particular individuals who have
influenced us enormously. Perhaps we can become
'boundary crossers' ourselves. Certainly, working
at the interface of science and science education
has been tremendously rewarding for me."
Paul Williams has seen the power of synergy
when people from various disciplines come
together and share a vision. The same can be true
in professional societies, when individuals
representing diverse professional societies come
together for a common purpose.
|